Did Russia
Interfere with the
2016 US election?
April 28, 2024
Just the summary:
The three major areas of interference were (1) hack-and-leak operations to publish stolen data from the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee, (2) cyber attacks directly on the election systems and (3) a sustained information warfare campaign that was conducted by the St. Petersburg-based Internet Research Agency (IRA).
Rather than focusing on specific voters or messages, the influence campaign sought to radicalise voters across the spectrum and erode trust in the election process, complemented by email leaks and cyberattacks on the voting systems.
There is mixed evidence on the effectiveness of the Russia election interference with some studies indicating a correlation, while others find it statistically insignificant.
The Mueller Report did not find that Trump directly colluded with Russians to swing the 2016 elections, however a number of people were convicted under the investigation, with many later pardoned by Donald Trump.
Russia has been reported to interfere with multiple elections since 2016, while pro-Western covert influence campaigns were also shown to exist since 2017.
Resources and further reading are at the bottom of the text.
Did Russia interfere with the 2016 US presidential election?
The US intelligence community and independent researchers have uncovered multiple ways that the Russian state attempted to affect the result of the election.
The three major areas of interference were (1) hack-and-leak operations to publish stolen data from the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee, (2) cyber attacks directly on the election systems and (3) a sustained information warfare campaign that was conducted by the St. Petersburg-based Internet Research Agency (IRA).
This influence campaign was a sophisticated and professional operation, designed to polarise public opinion and reduce trust in democratic institutions in the US and was ultimately funded by former Wagner leader, Yevgeny Prigozhin.
The IRA created tens of thousands of social media accounts to post and even advertise their content, targeting voters from both political camps but particularly the more disaffected elements of them.
The content often translated oversimplified or extremely exaggerated messages, but also included neutral or benign posts to promote the pages.
Rather than focusing on specific voters or messages, the influence campaign sought to radicalise voters across the spectrum and erode trust in the election process, complemented by email leaks and cyberattacks on the voting systems.
The IRA went as far as to organise a number of physical political rallies of the fake US groups it created. On at least one occasion two rallies of opposing political views were set up by the IRA within walking distance.
An analysis by Twitter identified 3,841 IRA-linked accounts which posted 175,993 Tweets, as well as 50,258 automated accounts posting or retweeting election-related content in the same time period, totaling nearly 10 million IRA-linked Tweets.
The core accounts normally posed as news outlets or organised groups and produced original content for various audiences.
Secondary accounts, often automated, normally posed as individuals and focused on retweeting and spreading the core content, including by following many real user accounts.
Data from Facebook showed that 120 Russian-backed pages built a network of over 3.3 million people. From these pages, 80,000 organic unpaid posts reached an estimated 126 million real people – more than a third of the US population.
A study from Oxford University used data provided by social media firms to explore how the IRA used Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and YouTube to impact US users.
Over 30 million users, between 2015 and 2017, shared the IRA’s Facebook and Instagram posts with their friends and family, liking, reacting to and commenting on them along the way, according to the study.
According to the report, Russia's IRA activities were designed to polarise the US public and interfere with the elections in a number of ways.
These included campaigning for African American voters to boycott elections or follow the wrong voting procedures in 2016.
The IRA also encouraged extreme right-wing voters to be more confrontational and spread “sensationalist, conspiratorial, and other forms of junk political news and misinformation to voters across the political spectrum”.
How effective was Russian 2016 election interference?
After his victory against Hillary Clinton in 2016, Donald Trump suggested that "the Russians had no impact on our votes whatsoever", however he did acknowledge their further attempts at election interferences in 2018.
The question of whether Russian interference directly led to Donald Trump edging the election victory has been deemed almost impossible to answer by senior figures in both the Democrat and the Republican parties.
However, attempts have been made to measure the impact that the interference had on voters.
In 2019, a study from researchers at the University of Tennessee-Knoxville found a correlation between retweets of known Russian troll accounts during the 2016 election and Donald Trump's poll numbers.
The study analysed 770,005 tweets in English and corresponding poll data, finding that every 25,000 retweets of troll accounts correlated to a 1% increase in Trump's poll numbers one week later.
Researchers from Columbia SIPA found that betting odds favouring Republicans hit their low point on Russian holidays when trolls were shown to be less active, while odds favouring Democrats peaked at the same time.
While these studies suggest a link between the influence campaign and voting intention, their findings aren’t conclusive.
A study from the Center for Social Media and Politics at New York University published in 2023 found no evidence of a statistically significant relationship between exposure to the Russian foreign influence campaign and changes in attitudes, polarisation or voting behaviour.
According to the research, an estimated 32 million Twitter users in the U.S. were potentially exposed to posts from Russian-sponsored accounts in the eight months leading up to the 2016 election.
Despite this, the study found that Russia's campaign wasn’t effective.
One reason was that 1% of Twitter users accounted for 70% of all exposures to foreign influence accounts – with the highest numbers of exposures concentrated among partisan Republicans.
Tweets seeking to influence voters were also seen far less often than content from domestic media and political sources.
A study by Loughborough University showed that media coverage of the disinformation campaigns undermined US citizens’ confidence in election results and satisfaction with democracy, something that could have had an effect on elections since.
Did Trump’s team cooperate with Russia to swing the election?
Some of the most serious allegations to emerge after 2016 elections were claims that Trump’s campaign had been colluding with Russia to influence the election in Trump’s favour.
These claims, along with the Trump campaign’s connections to Russia, became the subject of intense scrutiny and led to a series of investigations, a key one being the Mueller report.
Former FBI Director Robert Mueller was appointed as special counsel to FBI agents and Department of Justice officials who were investigating Russian interference.
Mueller’s team quickly brought charges against key Trump campaign players for criminal acts and compiled a report on Russian interference, a redacted version of which was published in March 2019.
“Although the investigation established that the Russian government perceived it would benefit from a Trump presidency and worked to secure that outcome, and that the Campaign expected it would benefit electorally from information stolen and released through Russian efforts, the investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.”
The investigation identified numerous links between the Russian government and the Trump Campaign, reported extensive criminal activity and said that Trump’s associates repeatedly lied to investigators about their contacts with the Russians.
The report also said that President Trump had tried to impede the investigation.
At least 7 people have been found or pled guilty and were convicted in the Mueller investigation so far, including former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort who pled guilty to conspiracy to defraud and obstruction of justice and was sentenced to over 7 years in prison.
Donald Trump granted presidential pardon to some of his previously convicted political allies towards the end of his presidency in 2020, including Paul Manafort and a number of other people convicted in the Mueller investigation.
Responses to Mueller’s report demonstrated how the interference continued to have an effect on US politics and democracy beyond the 2016 election itself.
This polarisation was highlighted in a HuffPost/YouGov poll from April 2019 where 86% of Clinton voters thought the Mueller report revealed that Trump had tried to obstruct Mueller’s investigation, compared to only 6% of Republicans who thought the same.
And some 65% of Clinton voters believed that the report suggested that Trump was unfit to be president, with only 1% of Republicans agreeing.
Election interferences since 2016
Throughout the election of 2016 and subsequent investigations, the Russian state denied involvement in the interference.
Russians believed that their government did not try to influence the election. In a study from Pew Research Center in 2018, only 15% of 1000 Russian respondents said their government did try to meddle.
Despite this, there is evidence to suggest that Russia has continued to interfere in elections beyond the US 2016 election.
Researchers at the Brennan Center for Justice found that social media accounts linked to the Internet Research Agency were active prior to 2020 presidential election.
Much of their activity seemed designed to discourage certain groups from voting, with a focus on swing states.
US intelligence report shared with 100 countries in 2023 finds that between 2020 and 2022 Russia sought to undermine public confidence in at least 11 elections in 9 democracies, including the 2020 US Presidential election, the results of which Donald Trump refused to accept.
Iran was also accused by the US of interfering in 2016 and 2020 elections.
A Stanford Internet Observatory study from 2022 described a dataset of 211 Twitter, Facebook and Instagram covert influence accounts posting pro-Western content in the Middle East and Central Asia since 2017.
Most recently, the 2023 parliamentary and 2024 presidential elections in Slovakia were preceded by broad disinformation campaigns and saw pro-Russian populist candidates taking the seats of Prime Minister and President.
As the 2024 US election approaches, with Trump trying to win a second term as president, Moscow is reportedly spreading disinformation about Joe Biden and other Democrats, according to a report from NBC.
Author William Nott
Editor Anton Kutuzov
Resources and further reading:
Twitterbots: Anatomy of a Propaganda Campaign (Symantec)
Reduced trolling on Russian holidays (Columbia)
IRA Twitter activity predicted 2016 US election polls
The IRA, Social Media and Political Polarization in the United States, 2012-2018 (Oxford)
Twitter report on 2016 bot activity
Select Committee on Intelligence report
All of Trump’s Russia ties in 7 charts (Politico)
US report alleging Russian interference in global elections (Reuters)
Unheard voice: Stanford report on pro-Western covert influence